Legal Opinion
Ely v. Klahr
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 7, 1971No. 548PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
This appeal is'the latest step in the long and fitful attempt. to devise a constitutionally valid reapportionment scheme for the State of Arizona. For the reasons given, we affirm the judgment of the District Court.
In April 1964, shortly-before this Court’s decision in Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533 (1964), and in its companion cases, suit was filed in the District Court for the District of Arizona attacking the then-existing state dis-tricting laws as unconstitutional.1 Following those decisions, the three-judge District Court ordered all proceed-; ings stayed “until the expiration of a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Burns v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Wells v. RockefellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Klahr v. GoddardDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Gaffney v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- City of Rome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Charles F. Zimmer, Stewart Marshall, Intervenor-Appellant v. John J. McKeithenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- White v. WeiserSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- McDaniel v. SanchezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.