Legal Opinion

Rieckhoff v. Woodhull

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1937No. 7,742PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Anderson

Plaintiff has appealed from an order denying his motion to set aside a judgment.

This action was brought to foreclose a real estate mortgage securing a note for $2,000. Both note and mortgage were executed in October, 1916, and matured on January 7, 1922. All of the defendants defaulted except the Standard Oil Company. In its answer the bar of the statute of limitations, as to the debt or note, was affirmatively pleaded.

After the ease was at issue, the cause was submitted for judgment and decision upon an agreed statement of facts. The essential facts as disclosed thereby are as follows: The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Douglass v. ToddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Schaefer v. WunderleIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Donlan v. Thompson Falls Copper & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Humbird v. ArnetMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Canning v. FriedMontana Supreme Court · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wiard v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Webb v. WebbWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Donovan v. GraffMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Uffleman v. LabbittMontana Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Schmidt v. Jomac, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API