Legal Opinion

Canning v. Fried

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1914No. 3,362PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; J. B. Poindexter, a Judge of the Fifth Judicial District, presiding. ’Action by Matthew T. Canning against Max Pried. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeal by defendant from an order denying a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

On March 26, 1912, a judgment upon a verdict was entered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, in an action for damages for malicious prosecution. Some time thereafter— the record does not disclose when—defendant was granted sixty days, in addition to the time allowed by law, within which to prepare a bill of exceptions in support of his motion for a new trial. On April 26 another like order was made, and on July 1 a third extension of sixty days’ additional time was granted by the trial court. All of these orders exténding the time were made without the consent of the adverse…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Donlan v. Thompson Falls Copper & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Greene v. Montana Brewing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. City of Butte v. GoodwinMontana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Ogle v. PotterMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Beach v. Spokane Ranch & Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1901

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Langston v. CurrieMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Higgins v. RuedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  3. State ex rel. Sinko v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Federal Land Bk. of Spokane v. Gallatin Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Rieckhoff v. WoodhullMontana Supreme Court · 1937

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API