Legal Opinion

Humbird v. Arnet

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1935No. 7,353PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Anderson

The plaintiffs, as testamentary trustees under the will of John A. Humbird, deceased, appointed as such by the probate court of Ramsey county, Minnesota, brought this action to foreclose a real estate mortgage on lands in Park county.

The defendant Charles A. Arnet on November 29, 1916, executed and delivered his promissory note in the sum of $25,000, payable March 1, 1922, unto the Union Trust & Sav ings Bank of Spokane, Washington, and on the same day he made, executed, acknowledged and delivered to secure the payment of this note, the mortgage sought to be foreclosed in this action, which…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Crisman v. LantermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Roman v. AlbertMontana Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Clary v. FlemingMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Barth v. ElyMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Fitzgerald v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Towe Antique Ford Foundation v. Internal Revenue Service, Department of Treasury, United StatesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1992
  2. Montana National Bank v. MichelsMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Territorial Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BairdCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  4. Premier Financial Services. v. CitibankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  5. Larson v. LarsonMontana Supreme Court · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API