Legal Opinion
Joyce v. Office of the Architect of the Capitol
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 27, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2012-1837PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Arthur Richard Joyce worked for the Office of the Architect of the Capitol for thirty-nine years. From 2000 to 2012, he served as a Facilities Supervisor, in which capacity he worked from 4:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. and oversaw both the day and night shifts. In March 2012, claiming it needed to beef up supervision of the day staff, the AOC shifted his hours somewhat later in the day. As this move left him unable to care for his young grandchildren, Joyce resigned and asserted constructive discharge. In this suit under the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ranowsky v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Burford v. YellenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Moses v. KerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Hodges v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Swann v. Office of the Architect of the CapitolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.