Dansereau v. Ulmer
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Public interest litigants prevailed on one of three issues. They claim it was error not to award them full reasonable attorney’s fees and certain expert witness fees. We hold that it was not error to deny the witness fees or to reduce the attorney’s fees to a reasonable amount, but that it was error to apportion the fees by issue. We therefore affirm in part and reverse in part.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Ten voters (Contestants) challenged the validity of the 1994 gubernatorial election in which Tony Knowles and Fran Ulmer were elected governor and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Beaulieu v. ElliottAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
- Petersen v. Mutual Life Insuarance Co. of New YorkAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Municipality of Anchorage v. GentileAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rockstad v. EriksonAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- State, Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. Native Village of NunapitchukAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- City of Kenai v. Friends of the Recreation Center, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Alaska Conservation Foundation v. Pebble Limited PartnershipAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.