Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Whipsker
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Bexar. Tried below before Hon. G-. H. Noonan.
1Opinion of the Court
GAINES, Associate Justice.
—This suit was brought by the defendant in error against plaintiff in error to recover a balance due him for services as a brakeman. The defendant company answered among other things that in a certain suit in which this plaintiff was defendant a writ of garnishment had been served upon it, and that upon the coming in of its answer a judgment ha'd been rendered against it, which it had joaid. A transcript of the proceedings in the garnishment suit was introduced in evidence by the defendant upon the trial. They showed that the defendant company answered that it was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Iglehart v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1858
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. RaglandIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
- Winterfield v. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by25 opinions
- J. M. Radford Grocery Co. v. McKeanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Baumgardner v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Agnew v. CroninCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Automobile Finance Co. v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Johnson v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.