Legal Opinion

Hibben v. Kuchaj

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 29, 1953No. 52 C 530PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, District Judge.

On March 7, 1952, plaintiff filed his complaint alleging that he was the occupant of certain premises located in Chicago, Illinois, owned by the defendants; that the premises were housing accommodations subject to the Housing and Rent Act of 1950 and the Housing and Rent Act of 1951, the Housing and *56Rent Act of 1947, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1881 et seq., and that the defendants had collected or received the sum of $1425 in excess of the maximum rent for the premises occupied by the plaintiff during the period between August 23, 1950, and February 1, 1952.

On…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Illinois Packing Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
  3. Fast v. Di Salle, Director of Price StabilizationEmergency Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Streck v. FlemingDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1947

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schackman v. ArneberghDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1966
  2. Fowler v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1966
  3. Pinkus v. ArneberghDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1966
  4. Moss v. HornigDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API