Legal Opinion

Schackman v. Arnebergh

District Court, C.D. California

Decided September 27, 1966No. 66-784PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAUK, District Judge.

This is an action for declaratory judgment and injunction brought by the owners, operators and employees of so-called “arcade” establishments in Los Angeles and Beverly Hills, California, where petitioners exhibit and sell “nudie” motion picture films. The method of operation is to exhibit the films in small booths, utilizing “peep show” machines which are activated when customers deposit silver coins for metered showings measured in terms of minutes proportionate to the value of the coins deposited. After viewing the films, the customers can later purchase the same.

Petiti…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Ginzburg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Mishkin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. David M. Foster v. Lawrence J. Walsh, Clerk, Akron Municipal CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. Flack v. Municipal Court for the Anaheim-Fullerton Judicial DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Quadra v. SUPERIOR COURT OF CITY & CTY. OF SAN FRANCISCODistrict Court, N.D. California · 1974
  4. P. B. I. C., Inc. v. ByrneDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1970
  5. Overstock Book Company v. BarryDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API