Legal Opinion

Moss v. Hornig

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided May 9, 1962No. Civ. 9261PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLUMENFELD, District Judge.

The plaintiff seeks injunctive relief from pending state criminal proceedings in which he is charged with violation of Conn.Gen.Stat. § 53-300 (Rev. of 1958), prohibiting Sunday retail sales. Alleging that the statute is unconstitutional, he applies for an injunction and requests a three-judge court be convened to hear his application, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2281.

The Three-Judge Court

28 U.S.C. § 2281, provides that an injunction

“restraining the enforcement, operation or execution of any State statute by restraining the action of any officer of such State in the…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fowler v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1966
  2. Bartlett & Co., Grain v. State Corp. Com'n of KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1963
  3. United States Ex Rel. Miller v. RundleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Pinkus v. ArneberghDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1966
  5. Johnson v. LeeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API