Legal Opinion

Pinkus v. Arnebergh

District Court, C.D. California

Decided September 27, 1966No. 66-861PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAUK, District Judge,

This is an action for declaratory judgment and injunction brought by the owner and operator of a so-called “arcade” establishment in the unincorporated territ0ry of Los Angeles County, California, where petitioner exhibits and sells “nudie” motion picture films and “nudjst” magazines. The method of operation is to exhibit the films in small booths, utilizing “peep show” machines which are activated when customers deposit silver coins for metered showings measured in terms of minutes proportionate to the value of the coins deposited. After viewing the films, the customers…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Ginzburg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. EpsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Mishkin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. P. B. I. C., Inc. v. ByrneDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1970
  2. Metros v. United States District Court for the District of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  3. Steve Metros v. The United States District Court For The District Of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  4. Sams v. New York State Board of ParoleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
  5. Veen v. DavisDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API