In Re Paul Graff
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Paul Graff appeals the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences 1 affirming the rejection of the claims of this reissue application. The Board held that grant of a reissue patent precludes the grant of a later reissue patent from a continuation reissue application. The Board also held that not only the reissue application but also broadening claims, as were sought by Mr. Graff, must be filed within two years of the original patent issue date. We reverse as to the first ground, and affirm as to the second. Thus…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- The Corn-Planter PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Wollensak v. ReiherSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Application of Henri-Georges DollCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- In Re Richard A. Fotland and Jeffrey J. CarrishCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
3Cited by12 opinions
- C.R. Bard, Inc. v. M3 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Aia Engineering Ltd. v. Magotteaux Intern. S/ACourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- In Re YoumanCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- In Re StaatsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- AIA Engineering Ltd. v. Magotteaux International S/ACourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.