De Asencio v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
In instructing the jury in this case brought by poultry workers under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (“FLSA” or “Act”), the District Court stated that in considering whether the workers’ donning, doffing and washing was “work” under the Act, the jury must consider whether the activities involved physical or mental exertion. The jury decided the issue of work against the workers and therefore never reached the defenses proffered by the employer. The workers appeal, arguing that the District Court’s instruction on donning and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- IBP, Inc. v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Steiner v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Perez v. Mountaire Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Lugo v. Farmers Pride, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Bouaphakeo v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2008
- Troester v. Starbucks CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Bobbi-Jo Smiley v. EI DuPont de Nemours & CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.