Home Insurance v. Swann
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
1. Under the ruling in Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co. v. Lindsey, 32 Ga. App. 683 (124 S. E. 369), the contract declared on in each of these eases is not contrary to public policy, and is enforceable in a court of justice, and the court did not err in overruling the defendant’s motion (made in each case) to dismiss the plaintiff’s action. The decisions in Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co. v. Jackson, 161 Ga. 559 (131 S. E. 359), Williams v. Empire etc. Insurance Co., 8 Ga. App. 304 (68 S. E. 1082), and Lytle v. Scottish American Mortgage Co., 122 Ga. 459 (50 S. E. 402), cited by counsel for the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lytle v. Scottish American Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Williams v. Empire Mutual Annuity & Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
- Home Insurance v. SwannCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Home Insurance v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- South Georgia Farmers Fire Insurance v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932