Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
The clause of the insurance policy, designated as (a) is devoid of ambiguity. The act of the insurer, that is, the effort to collect unpaid portions of the premium represented by notes, was a matter subsequent to the issuance of the policy and does not fall within that class of eases where the acts were done previous to or simultaneously with the issuance of the policy and were held to be waivers. Johnson v. Ætna Insurance Co., 123 Ga. 404 (51 S. E. 339, 107 Am. St. R. 92), and authorities cited. The contract of insurance provided: “It is understood and expressly agreed that this company…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Johnson v. Ætna InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Williams v. Albany City InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Wall v. . the Home Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1867
- Jefferson Mutual Insurance v. MurrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
3Cited by7 opinions
- Meyer v. National Fire InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Struebing v. American InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
- Home Insurance v. SwannCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
- Roth v. National Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.