Legal Opinion

American Casualty Co. v. Corum

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 15, 1996No. 9110-06813; CA A78835PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Cross-respondent Truck Insurance Exchange (Farmers) and respondent American Casualty Company (CNA) both petition for reconsideration of our opinion on remand from the Supreme Court. 139 Or App 58, 910 P2d 1151 (1996). ORAP 6.25. We deny Farmers’ petition, allow CNA’s and adhere to our opinion.

1. CNA argues that we erred when we held that although Corum’s misdemeanor conviction for sexual abuse established a knowing violation of a criminal statute, it did not establish a willful violation within CNA’s policy exclusion for willful violations “of a statute, ordinance or regulation imposing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ledford v. GutoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SchenckOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. American Casualty Co. v. CorumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martin v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API