Legal Opinion

Pine Ridge Park v. Fugere

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 26, 2012No. C093207EV; A149364PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Defendant appeals from the denial of her motion to quash a notice of restitution in this forcible entry and detainer (FED) action. This case poses the issue whether the filing of a supersedeas undertaking on appeal pursuant to ORS 19.335(2) tolls the 60-day limit on issuance of process to enforce a judgment for restitution of premises under ORS 105.159(3). We affirm.

Defendant was a tenant in a manufactured home park owned by plaintiff. Plaintiff sent defendant a notice to vacate the premises, and, after a trial, the court entered a judgment of restitution of the premises in favor of plaintiff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. ToevsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Caveny v. ASHEIMOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  5. State v. SmallOregon Supreme Court · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oakleigh-McClure Neighbors v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. Willamette Landing Apartments - 89, LLC v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API