McDonald v. Cox
Arizona Supreme Court
EBROB to the District Court of tbe Third Judicial District, in and for the County of Maricopa. Edward Kent, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion. Alleged errors, not having been assigned as grounds for new trial, are not properly before the supreme court. Chicago B. & Q. B. B. Go. v. Pollock, 16 Wyo. 321, 93 Pae. 847-853. Errors occurring at the trial will not be reviewed unless presented to the trial court in a motion for new trial.
Read the full summary
EBROB to the District Court of tbe Third Judicial District, in and for the County of Maricopa. Edward Kent, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion. Alleged errors, not having been assigned as grounds for new trial, are not properly before the supreme court. Chicago B. & Q. B. B. Go. v. Pollock, 16 Wyo. 321, 93 Pae. 847-853. Errors occurring at the trial will not be reviewed unless presented to the trial court in a motion for new trial. Glaser v. Glaser, 13 Ohl. 389, 74 Pae. 944; Bradford v. Brennan, 15 Okl. 47, 78 Pac. 387; Insurance. Go. v. Evans, 64 Kan. 770, 68 Pae. 623; Pringle v.…
1Opinion of the Court
DOAN, J. —
This action was brought by H. N. Cox against the Garcia Gold Company and R. D. McDonald in the district court of Maricopa county in the April term, 1906. It was tried before the court without a jury, and a judgment with decree for foreclosure of the lien was rendered against the defendant R. D. McDonald, who is the plaintiff in error in this court, and the action was dismissed as against the codefend-ant, the Garcia Gold Company. A notice of appeal was given, but such appeal was not perfected, and, after the time for appeal had lapsed, the case was brought for review before this…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Nesbit v. HinesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Glaser v. GlaserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- City of Atchison v. ByrnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- Putnam v. PutnamArizona Supreme Court · 1890
- Buettinger v. HurleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Walker v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 1910