Buettinger v. Hurley
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Leavenworth District Gowrt. Two actions — one of unlawful detainer, and the other in the nature of ejectment — brought by Buettinger against Hurley and another. In the former action, judgment for costs against the plaintiff was rendered at the April Term, 1883; in the latter action, judgment for costs against the plaintiff at the September Term, 1883. Hurley brings the cases here. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
Two cases of the same title are now presented to this court upon the same briefs and the same argument. The first case was an action of unlawful detainer, commenced originally by William Buettinger against Margaret Hurley and G. M. Hurley before a justice of the peace, to recover the possession of a certain piece of land, which action was taken on appeal to the district court, where it was tried before the court and a jury, and judgment rendered in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff for costs. The other case was an action…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Decker v. HouseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Larco v. ClementsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Church v. GoodinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- Chamberlain v. EckertU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1869
- Swart v. BorstNew York Supreme Court · 1858
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State ex rel. Hopkins v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
- Stanard v. Sampson Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- McCracken v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
- Allen v. HounWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
- Owen v. District Court of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.