Spiegle v. Borough of Beach Haven
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Haneman, J.
Judgments were entered in the Superior Court, Law Division, in two separate cases, holding, inter alia, that two ordinances as amended (which, for convenience, we shall hereafter refer to as (1) “fence ordinance” and (2) “dune ordinance”) and adopted by defendant were constitutional. The separate appeals, limited to the constitutional issues, which were taken to the Appellate Division, were consolidated. Before argument in the Appellate Division, this Court certified the appeals on its own motion, R. R. 1:10-1.
Plaintiffs are the owners of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Caltex (Philippines), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Miller v. Beaver FallsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Hager v. Louisville & Jefferson County Planning & Zoning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Dome Realty, Inc. v. City of PatersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- NJ Sports & Exposition Auth. v. McCraneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Gardner v. New Jersey Pinelands CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- Toms River Affiliates v. DEPT., ENVIRON. PROTEC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Cappture Realty Corp. v. Bd. of Adj. of Elmwood Pk.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.