Horton v. Howard
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Clair. (Canfield, J.) Ejectment. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, C. J.
The plaintiff brings ejectment. The parties claim title from a common source.
The plaintiff claims title to an undivided one-eighth of certain premises through a deed executed on a foreclosure of a mortgage, upon the premises in question pursuant to a decree of the circuit court for the county of St. Clair, in chancery. In this suit for foreclosure the complain■ants were Rebecca Horton, Carlos D. Horton, and Etta M. Beard, and John Hibbard, William B. Hibbard, and ■others were defendants. The bill was taken as confessed against the Hibbards for want of appearance. The circuit •court was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Oakley v. . AspinwallNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Matter of RyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Chambers v. HodgesTexas Supreme Court · 1859
- Hall v. ThayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Stockwell v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Bliss v. Caille Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Warner v. NobleMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Gillen v. Wakefield State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Carr v. DuhmeIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- In Re Woodside-Florence Irr. Dist.Montana Supreme Court · 1948
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.