Legal Opinion

Carr v. Duhme

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1906No. 20,698PublishedCited by 22 opinions

From White Circuit Court; T. F. Palmer, Judge. Drainage proceedings by John P. Carr and others, against which Ophelia F. Duhme and others remonstrate. From a judgment sustaining remonstrants’ motion to remand the cause to the board of commissioners, petitioners appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This proceeding was commenced before the Board of Commissioners of the County of White upon a petition by appellants for the construction of a ditch. In the absence of one of the members of the board the remaining members, Joseph Taylor and George T. Ins-keep, appointed viewers, who viewed the proposed ditch, made and filed their report finding the same to be of public utility, and assessed benefits for its construction. Notice of the pendency of said petition and report, and of the time fixed for the hearing of the same, was given as required by law. This report disclosed that lands of said…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Chambers v. HodgesTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Case v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Hall v. ThayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. People ex rel. Carrillo v. De la GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Horton v. HowardMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Tari v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Leonard v. WillcoxSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  3. Stahl v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  4. Galey v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. BOARD OF MED. REGIS. AND EXAM. v. ArmingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1961

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API