Legal Opinion
In Re Woodside-Florence Irr. Dist.
Montana Supreme Court
Decided May 6, 1948No. 8727PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Adair
This is an appeal from an order made by the Honorable Albert Besancon, a judge of the district court of the fourth judicial district of the state of Montana in and for the county of Ravalli, establishing the Woodside-Florence Irrigation District wherein are included appellants’ lands.
The irrigation district includes approximately 15,000 acres of land in the Bitterroot valley lying to the west of the Bitter-root river. The estimated cost of the project is $1,444,000.00.
The proceedings were commenced by filing in said district court a petition signed by numerous petitioners alleged to represent…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ex Parte ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Oakley v. . AspinwallNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Case v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Hall v. ThayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- State ex rel. Carleton v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1905
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Rodríguez Figueroa v. El Registrador de la Propiedad de GuayamaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
- Daniels v. Thomas, Dean & Hoskins, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Peery v. District Court of the Fourth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Greely v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1979
- Cascade County Consumers Ass'n v. Public Service CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1964
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.