Legal Opinion
In Re Formal Inquiry Concerning Judge Foster
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 29, 1974No. [Misc. (Judicial Disabilities) No. 1, September Term, 1973.]PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSingley, J.
Smith and Digges, JJ., dissent and Smith, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which Digges, J., concurs at page 478 infra.
This is the second occasion on which we are called upon to review a report and recommendation of the Commission on Judicial Disabilities (the Commission). The circumstances which led to the adoption of the two constitutional amendments, which first enacted and then amended Maryland Constitution art. IV, §§ 4A, 4B, creating the Commission, are set forth in the opinion of this Court in In re Diener & Broccolino, 268 Md. 659, 662-67, 304 A. 2d 587, 589-92 (1973), cert. denied,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Geiler v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- In Re Formal Inquiry Concerning Judge DienerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Space Aero Products Co. v. R. E. Darling Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Friedman v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge NowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- In Re ChaissonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Matter of LarsenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- In Re the Disbarment of GillardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- In Re Inquiry Concerning BakerMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.