B. F. Goodrich Rubber Co. v. Sewell Cushion Wheel Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Codd, J. Assumpsit by the B. F. Goodrich Rubber Company against the Sewell Cushion Wheel Company for goods sold and delivered. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error. Plaintiff and its predecessors for a number of years manufactured and sold to defendant rubber cushions, used by it in a specially designed and patented automobile wheel, used principally on automobile trucks.
Read the full summary
Error to Wayne; Codd, J. Assumpsit by the B. F. Goodrich Rubber Company against the Sewell Cushion Wheel Company for goods sold and delivered. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error. Plaintiff and its predecessors for a number of years manufactured and sold to defendant rubber cushions, used by it in a specially designed and patented automobile wheel, used principally on automobile trucks. The cushions are made of the best grade rubber that could be procured and are sold on a five-year guaranty. In October, 1913, defendant gave an order for some of these cushions, and during the…
1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.
(after stating the facts). Three grounds are urged by plaintiff in its. brief for a reversal of the judgment, viz.:(1) That the court erred in refusing to strike out the testimony of the witness Robinson.(2) That the court erred in refusing to direct a verdict for plaintiff.
*603(3) That there was prejudicial argument by defendant’s counsel.
1. The defendant called as a witness F. W. Robinson, a chemist, who testified that he had analyzed and made tests of the rubber which had been recured by plaintiff, and compared it with rubber received from plaintiff about the same time, which had not been…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Samberg v. Knights of the Modern MaccabeesMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Dugger v. . McKessonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Lonier v. Ann Arbor Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- East Tennesse, Virginia & Georgia Railway Co. v. TurvavilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- King v. HaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Foster v. RinzMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Bridwell v. SegelMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Buckner Loan Co. v. BicherMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Jordan v. BurghardtMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Curry v. KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.