City of Huntington v. Bartrom
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom Huntington Circuit Court; Samuel E. Cook, Judge. Action by Paul E. Bartrom, by his next friend, against the City of Huntington. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtHottel, J.
Action for damages by Paul E. Bartrom, by his next friend, Jacob Bartrom, on account of injury alleged to have been sustained by said Paul E. Bartrom, by reason of his stumbling and falling over an alleged protruding stone in one of the sidewalks of said city.
The complaint was in one paragraph, the sufficiency of *118which is not questioned by this appeal. An answer in general denial was filed, and the cause was tried by a jury, which returned a general verdict for appellee in the sum of $250, with which answers to interrogatories were filed.
Upon the conclusion of appellee’s evidence, appellant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Newton v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- City of Indianapolis v. CookIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- City of Franklin v. HarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- City of Michigan City v. BoecklingIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Haggerty v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. FryeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Smith v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Sullivan v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1937
- Town of Mooresville v. SpoonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
- City of Indianapolis v. ReynoldsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942