Legal Opinion

Nenoff v. Culligan Soft Water

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1974No. 11382PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the Industrial Commission of the State of Idaho which reversed a decision of an appeals examiner who ruled that claimant-appellant Robert J. Nenoff was eligible for unemployment benefits. Appellant was employed by Culligan Soft Water as a salesman of water conditioning equipment from September, 1970, until November, 1972, at which time he quit his employment. During that period of time appellant worked both as a salesman and as sales manager for the firm. Appellant testified as to several reasons for quitting his employment with Culligan Soft…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Madron v. Green Giant CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Swan v. WilliamsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Alder v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Toland v. SchneiderIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  5. In Re MacKenzieIdaho Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of StiborIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Lynch v. CheneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Wulff v. Sun Valley Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Reedy v. M.H. King Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Hatley v. Lewiston Grain Growers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API