Legal Opinion

Whalen v. Strong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On reaxgument, judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Upon reargument and upon reconsideration it now appears that none of the parties to the action contends that other creditors exist whose claims should be adjudicated with the plaintiffs for the reason that such other creditors are similarly situated — and no such other creditors have come to our notice. In these circumstances we now find that plaintiffs were not required to bring a representative action and that they are entitled to recover their personal judgment from the defendants named in the seventeenth paragraph of the judgment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Caesar v. BernardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  2. Caesar v. . BernardNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Buckley v. StansfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  4. Buckley v. . StansfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thorne Neale & Co. v. New York Southern Coal Terminal Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  2. Brown Packing Co. v. LewisNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  3. New York Credit Men's Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. WeissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  4. Hewlett Park Co. v. 1193-1205 East Broadway of Hewlett, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Trionics Research Sales Corp. v. Nautec Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API