Legal Opinion

Trionics Research Sales Corp. v. Nautec Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 10, 1968PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBreitel, J.

Defendants appeal. In an action for damages based on an allegedly fraudulent transfer or preference, the Supreme Court, New York County, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment and granted plaintiff’s cross motion for the same relief. The Appellate Division affirmed in a memorandum (one Justice dissenting). It held that the prorata distribution of all its assets, located in Wisconsin, by defendant debtor (Trionics) to plaintiff (Trionics Research) and defendant Nautec, its two sole remaining creditors, while defendant debtor was insolvent and after plaintiff had obtained judgments in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Throop v. Hatch Lithographic Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Curran v. OppenheimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  4. Whalen v. StrongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  5. Whalen v. StrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Atlanta Shipping Corp., Inc. v. Chemical BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  2. Wedtech Corp. v. Nofziger (In Re Wedtech Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API