Buckley v. . Stansfield
New York Court of Appeals
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 11, 1913, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff for an amount less than her claim, entered upon the report of a referee in an action brought and maintained by the plaintiff, a judgment creditor of the defendant United Cloak and Suit Company, under subdivision 2 of section 90 of the General Corporation Law, to compel the defendant William H.…
Read the full summary
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered March 11, 1913, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff for an amount less than her claim, entered upon the report of a referee in an action brought and maintained by the plaintiff, a judgment creditor of the defendant United Cloak and Suit Company, under subdivision 2 of section 90 of the General Corporation Law, to compel the defendant William H. Stansfield, as a director of said corporation, to account for the value of property transferred by him as one of the…
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Cuddeback, Miller and Seabury, JJ. Not sitting: Hogan, J.
2Cited by17 opinions
- Buttles v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Whalen v. StrongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Quinn v. PostDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Thorne Neale & Co. v. New York Southern Coal Terminal Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Shaw v. Ansaldi Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.