Garshol v. Atlantic Refining Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
NOONAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, as administrators of the estate •of the deceased seaman, seek to recover •damages for his wrongful death on board the defendant’s vessel, The Atlantic Belgium.
Defendant corporation 'has moved this court under Rule 30(b), Fed.Rules Civ. Proc. 28 U.S.C.A., to vacate plaintiffs’ notice of deposition, or in the alternative, that the depositions be taken at defendant’s principal place of business, Fort Miffin, Pa.
In the notice of taking the deposition, which is in issue here, plaintiffs seek to examine the defendant by its (a) Superintendent of Operations, (b)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cohen v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Fruit Growers Co-Op. v. California Pie & Baking Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1942
- Hirsch v. Glidden Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- Czuprynski v. Shenango Furnace Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1942
3Cited by9 opinions
- Harbor v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Fairbanks North Star Borough v. Tundra Tours, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Krauss v. Erie R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Fischer & Porter Co. v. Sheffield Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1962
- Fay v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.