Legal Opinion

Czuprynski v. Shenango Furnace Co.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided July 9, 1942No. Civil Action No. 974PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, District Judge.

This is a motion for an order requiring the testimony of an employee of the defendant to be taken by deposition upon oral examination; requiring such employee to attend and be examined “at a time when said vessel (defendant’s) arrives at the port of Buffalo during the course of the navigation season; and for a further order requiring defendant herein to give due notice of such arrival and to compel the attendance of such witness.”

It seems quite obvious that this court has no authority to grant this order. First: The defendant can not be required to produce its employee…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sugarhill Records Ltd. v. Motown Record Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  2. Mulligan v. Eastern S. S. Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
  3. Garshol v. Atlantic Refining Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
  4. Cleveland v. PalmbyDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1977
  5. Alfred Bell & Co. v. Catalda Fine Arts, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API