Legal Opinion

State v. Ruggeri

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1967No. 10730PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLETT, Justice:

The State of Utah seeks an extraordinary writ to compel the defendant judge to reverse his holding and to admit in evidence testimony which he had theretofore held inadmissible.

Rule 6SB, U.R.C.P., is as follows:(a) Special Forms of Writs Abolished. Special forms of pleadings and of writs in habeas corpus, mandamus, quo war-ranto, certiorari, prohibition, and other extraordinary writs, as heretofore known, are hereby abolished. Where no other plain, speedy and adequate remedy exists, relief may be obtained by appropriate action under these rules, on any one of the grounds set…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Tuckett; Concurrence · Callister.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. State v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. State v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  5. People v. SteudingNew York Court of Appeals · 1959

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. IversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  2. In re Criminal Investigation, 7th District Court No. CS-1Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Renn v. Utah State Board of PardonsUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Bernat v. AllphinUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Salt Lake City v. CarnerUtah Supreme Court · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API