Legal Opinion

People v. Steuding

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 1959PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFtjld, J.

By virtue of the Constitution of this State (art. I, § 6) — and it is solely the Constitution of New York with which we are now concerned — a prospective defendant or one who is a target of an investigation may not be called and examined. *217before a Grand Jury and, if he is, his constitutionally-conferred privilege against self incrimination is deemed violated even though he does not claim or assert the privilege. (See, e.g., People v. De Feo, 308 N. Y. 595, 603; People v. Ferola, 215 N. Y. 285, 289-290; People v. Gillette, 126 App. Div. 665, 667 et seq.) People v. Bermel, 71 Misc. 356, 359 et…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. GilletteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. People v. De FeoNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. People v. BermelNew York Supreme Court · 1911
  4. People v. . FerolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1915

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States v. Hyman WinterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  2. State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. Uniformed Sanitation Men Association, Inc. v. Commissioner of Sanitation of the City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  4. Stevens v. MarksSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. People v. DunbarNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API