People v. Steuding
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFtjld, J.
By virtue of the Constitution of this State (art. I, § 6) — and it is solely the Constitution of New York with which we are now concerned — a prospective defendant or one who is a target of an investigation may not be called and examined. *217before a Grand Jury and, if he is, his constitutionally-conferred privilege against self incrimination is deemed violated even though he does not claim or assert the privilege. (See, e.g., People v. De Feo, 308 N. Y. 595, 603; People v. Ferola, 215 N. Y. 285, 289-290; People v. Gillette, 126 App. Div. 665, 667 et seq.) People v. Bermel, 71 Misc. 356, 359 et…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. GilletteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- People v. De FeoNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- People v. BermelNew York Supreme Court · 1911
- People v. . FerolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. Hyman WinterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Uniformed Sanitation Men Association, Inc. v. Commissioner of Sanitation of the City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Stevens v. MarksSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. DunbarNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.