Legal Opinion

Moore Drug Company v. Schaneman

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 17, 1969No. 1 CA-CIV 933PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBSON, Judge.

This appeal raises the question of the sufficiency of the evidence necessary to support a plaintiff’s burden of proof.

The defendants-appellees, HAROLD FRANCIS SCHANEMAN, and his wife were wholesale tobacco suppliers operating in Maricopa County. Between 1956 and 1964, defendants had been the sole supplier of tobacco products for the plaintiffs-ap pellants MOORE DRUG COMPANY, an Arizona corporation, and ELEANOR H. WATSON and S. C. NEUKOM, dba EVER READY DRUG COMPANY. For convenience in this opinion the plaintiffs will be designated jointly as “plaintiffs”, or as “Moore Drug” or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
  3. United States v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1962
  4. Hyman v. RegensteinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  5. Kravitz EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chaney Building Co. v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Hibbs v. Calcot, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. Industrial Park Corp. v. U. S. I. F. Palo Verde Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  4. Martin v. AlthoffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. Tash v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API