Legal Opinion
Tash v. Saunders
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 15, 1987No. 2 CA-CIV 5880PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FERNANDEZ, Judge.
The court dismissed three counts of appellants’ complaint which involved allegations that appellees wrongfully interfered with appellants’ contractual relationship with a third party. The ruling apparently was based on a finding that the issue had been resolved in a previous lawsuit between the parties or that Arizona had no personal jurisdiction over appellees. We affirm.
Appellants Sy and Joy Tash own an art gallery in Scottsdale, Arizona. In June of 1982 they entered into two agreements with Stephen Reyes, an artist, which gave appellants the exclusive right to sell…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Northern Propane Gas Co. v. KippsArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- Newhall v. McGillArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Springfield Credit Union v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sabek, Inc. v. Engelhard Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Balestrieri v. BalestrieriCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- City of Tucson v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Singer v. palmer/mondexCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019