Legal Opinion
Wieland v. United States Department of Health & Human Services
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided July 21, 2016No. Case No. 4:13-cv-01577-JCHPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Jean C. Hamilton, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter is before the Court on the Parties’ cross Motions for Summary Judgment. (ECF Nos. 75, 78.) The Motions have been fully briefed and are ready for disposition.
BACKGROUND
On August 14, 2013, Plaintiffs Paul and Teresa Wieland filed this action against Defendants challenging the so-called “contraceptive mandate” (hereinafter, the “Mandate”) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”), Pub. L. No. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119. The Mandate requires that group health plans and health insurance issuers provide…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Real Alternatives, Inc. v. Secretary Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe v. County of Mille Lacs, MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
- Real Alternatives, Inc. v. Secretary Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Real Alternatives, Inc. v. Secretary Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017