Legal Opinion

Schuylkill Energy Resources, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Company

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 2, 1997No. 96-1447PublishedCited by 400 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

MANSMANN, Circuit Judge.

Schuylkill Energy Resources, Inc., (“SER”) filed this antitrust action against Pennsylvania Power & Light Co. (“PP & L”) for allegedly monopolizing and attempting to monopolize the provision of electric energy to retail consumers within PP & L’s service area and to wholesale resellers affiliated with PP & L. SER contends that PP & L impermissibly curtailed purchases of SER-generated electric energy and that SER was therefore unable to compete with PP & L in the provision of electric energy to consumers in the retail market and resellers in the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. National Society of Professional Engineers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillanSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by400 opinions

  1. Baraka v. McGreeveyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. Maio v. Aetna, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  3. City of Pittsburgh v. West Penn Power Comp., D/B/A Allegheny Power Allegheny Power System, Incorporated Duquesne Light Company Dqe, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  4. West Penn Allegheny Health System, Inc. v. UPMCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. Carol Vorchheimer v. Philadelphian Owners AssociatiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018

395 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API