Legal Opinion

Carskaddon v. Pine

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1900No. 18,782PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Erom the St. Joseph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMoots, J.

Appellee, Pine, sued appellants, Carskaddon and wife, to foreclose a mortgage on real estate, and to recover a personal judgment against Carskaddon on the promissory notes secured thereby. The cause was tried by the court, a special finding of facts made, and conclusions of law stated thereon against appellants, and over a motion for a new trial a judgment on said note and decree foreclosing said mortgage was rendered.

The errors assigned and not waived are: (1) The complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; (2) the court erred in overruling the motion for a new…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Browning v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Nelson v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Shane v. LowryIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Strong v. DowningIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Clough v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Home InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Boseker v. ChamberlainIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Gray v. McLaughlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SchmuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. White v. SuggsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API