Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Schmuck
Indiana Supreme Court
From Blackford Circuit Court; Charles TS. Sturgis, Judge. Action by Henry M. Sehmuek against The Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
This was an action by appellee against appellant to foreclose a sewer assessment lien on appellant’s real estate in Hartford City. It is alleged in the complaint that the property was assessed in a certain sum for the construction of a sewer; that bonds were issued to the contractor, who sold and transferred the one in suit to appellee. There is a demand for the principal and interest due on the bond, for the value of appellee’s attorney’s fees, and a foreclosure of the assessment lien. Appellant’s demurrer to the complaint, for insufficient facts, was overruled, and the cause was tried on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Moore v. SargentIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Edwards v. CooperIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FishIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Farmers Mutual Fire Insurance v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Carskaddon v. PineIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- STATE EX REL. HABERKORN v. DeKalb Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
- White v. SuggsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- St. Francis Levee District v. DorrohSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
- Rodebaugh v. RodebaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
- Gradeless v. Gradeless, Admr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.