Legal Opinion
Runnymede-Piper v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 3, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-0930PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Karen Runnymede-Piper (“Plaintiff’) originally filed this action in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, alleging that the named defendants, governmental bodies and health care providers, wrongfully separated her from her child at birth. The action was subsequently removed by the defendants to this Court on June 4, 2012, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1441, on the basis of federal question jurisdiction deriving from Plaintiffs claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Notice of Removal, ECF No. [1] at ¶ 3; see also Notices of Consent to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Melton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Wells v. HenseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Pollard v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Yancey v. St. Elizabeths HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Bradley v. Dc Public SchoolsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.