Legal Opinion

State v. Cheatam

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 2003No. 73079-2PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

Jerry Dawayne Cheatam, who was convicted of first degree rape, contends that police violated the state and federal constitutions when, acting without a warrant, an officer retrieved his shoes as evidence in this case from a jail property bag four days after Cheatam’s arrest on an unrelated charge. He also claims that the trial court erred in excluding expert testimony on the reliability of eyewitness identification and that the prosecutor engaged in misconduct by commenting on the defense’s failure to produce a witness to corroborate his alibi. We affirm Cheatam’s conviction.

*631Facts

On January…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Illinois v. LafayetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. State v. ThorgersonWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. State v. MontgomeryWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. MontgomeryWashington Supreme Court · 2008

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API