Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Granite Worsted Mills, Inc. & Aaronson Cowen, Ltd.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 4, 1969PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
Granite Worsted Mills, Inc. (“ Seller ”) made two sales of certain cloth goods to Aaronson Cowen, Ltd. (“ Buyer ”) to be used in the manufacture of sport coats. In each case, sales agreements were employed which included broad arbitration clauses and clauses which limited the buyer’s damages for defective goods. Paragraph 12 of each of the sales agreements contained the following language: ‘ ‘ Arbitration. Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this contract shall be settled by arbitration ”.
With respect to the goods delivered pursuant to each of the sales agreements, the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of WilkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Matter of Stange v. Thompson-Starrett Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
3Cited by58 opinions
- Norris v. CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,679 in the Matter of the Arbitration Between Herbert Sobel, and Hertz, Warner & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Harty v. Cantor Fitzgerald and Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Mobil Oil Indonesia Inc. v. Asamera Oil (Indonesia) Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Farkar Company, and R. A. Hanson Disc, Ltd., and R. A. Hanson Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.