Legal Opinion

Mobil Oil Indonesia Inc. v. Asamera Oil (Indonesia) Ltd.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 19, 1977PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Gabrielli, J.

In this proceeding, petitioner seeks to vacate "the interlocutory award of the arbitral tribunal” on the ground that the arbitrators exceeded their authority in determining the applicable procedural rules to be used during the course of the arbitration. We decline to do so and hold that the courts have no authority to review an interlocutory ruling made by the arbitrators.

On July 16, 1968 the appellant entered into a contract with respondents involving rights to exploration and production of vast petroleum reserves in Sumatra, Republic of Indonesia. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Arbitration Between Weinrott & CarpNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Nationwide General Insurance v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. In re the Arbitration between Granite Worsted Mills, Inc. & Aaronson Cowen, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Jones v. . WelwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1877

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. 166 Mamaroneck Ave. Corp. v. 151 East Post Road Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Smith Barney Shearson Inc. v. SacharowNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Sablosky v. Edward S. Gordon Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. In Re the Arbitration Between Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Authority v. Star Lines Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  5. Miner v. WaldenNew York Supreme Court · 1979

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API