Commissioner v. Fink
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Powell
The question in this case is whether a dominant shareholder who voluntarily surrenders a portion of his shares to the corporation, but retains control, may immediately deduct from taxable income his basis in the surrendered shares.
I
Respondents Peter and Karla Fink were the principal shareholders of Travco Corporation, a Michigan manufacturer of motor homes. Travco had one class of common stock outstanding and no preferred stock. Mr. Fink owned 52.2 percent, and Mrs. Fink 20.3 percent, of the outstanding *91shares.1 Travco urgently needed new capital as a result of financial difficulties it…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Koshland v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Dickman v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Downer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Shakur v. SelskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Katherine Bordallo AguonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Centel Communications Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
- Hobart Corp. v. Waste Management of Ohio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- American Medical Association, Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.