Legal Opinion

Commissioner v. Fink

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 22, 1987No. 86-511PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Powell

The question in this case is whether a dominant shareholder who voluntarily surrenders a portion of his shares to the corporation, but retains control, may immediately deduct from taxable income his basis in the surrendered shares.

I

Respondents Peter and Karla Fink were the principal shareholders of Travco Corporation, a Michigan manufacturer of motor homes. Travco had one class of common stock outstanding and no preferred stock. Mr. Fink owned 52.2 percent, and Mrs. Fink 20.3 percent, of the outstanding *91shares.1 Travco urgently needed new capital as a result of financial difficulties it…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Koshland v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Dickman v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Downer v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Shakur v. SelskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. Katherine Bordallo AguonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Centel Communications Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
  4. Hobart Corp. v. Waste Management of Ohio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  5. American Medical Association, Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API