Dickman v. Commissioner
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burger
We granted certiorari to resolve a conflict among the Circuits as to whether intrafamily, interest-free demand loans result in taxable gifts of the value of the use of the money lent.
I
A
Paul and Esther Dickman were husband and wife; Lyle Dickman was their son. Paul, Esther, Lyle, and Lyle’s wife *332and children were the owners of Artesian Farm, Inc. (Arte-sian), a closely held Florida corporation. Between 1971 and 1976, Paul and Esther loaned substantial sums to Lyle and Artesian. Over this 5-year interval, the outstanding balances for the loans from Paul to Lyle varied from $144,715 to $342,915;…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Automobile Club of Mich. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bob Jones University v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Commissioner v. WemyssSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by181 opinions
- Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- United States v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Merrill v. Abbott (In Re Independent Clearing House Co.)District Court, D. Utah · 1987
- Elec. Arts, Inc. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2002
- Esden v. Bank of BostonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
176 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.