Legal Opinion

Dickman v. Commissioner

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 16, 1984No. 82-1041PublishedCited by 181 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Burger

We granted certiorari to resolve a conflict among the Circuits as to whether intrafamily, interest-free demand loans result in taxable gifts of the value of the use of the money lent.

I

A

Paul and Esther Dickman were husband and wife; Lyle Dickman was their son. Paul, Esther, Lyle, and Lyle’s wife *332and children were the owners of Artesian Farm, Inc. (Arte-sian), a closely held Florida corporation. Between 1971 and 1976, Paul and Esther loaned substantial sums to Lyle and Artesian. Over this 5-year interval, the outstanding balances for the loans from Paul to Lyle varied from $144,715 to $342,915;…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Automobile Club of Mich. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Bob Jones University v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Dixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Commissioner v. WemyssSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by181 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. United States v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Merrill v. Abbott (In Re Independent Clearing House Co.)District Court, D. Utah · 1987
  4. Elec. Arts, Inc. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2002
  5. Esden v. Bank of BostonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

176 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API