Legal Opinion

Hyle v. Porter

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 2006No. C-050768PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mark P. Painter, Judge.

{¶ 1} In this case, we address whether R.C. 2950.031 — Ohio’s residency-restriction statute prohibiting certain sexually oriented offenders from living within 1,000 feet of a school — can be applied to an offender who had bought his home and committed his offense before July 31, 2003 (the statute’s effective date). It can.

{¶ 2} Defendant-appellant, Gerry R. Porter Jr., is a convicted sex offender who had lived within 1,000 feet of a school until he was forced to leave his home by the Hamilton County Common Pleas Court. The trial court found that Porter was in violation…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. De Veau v. BraistedSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hyle v. PorterOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State Ex Rel. White v. Billings, Ca2006-09-072 (8-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. City of Lancaster v. Lawson, 07 Ca 46 (6-9-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney v. Walker, 07-Ap-165 (9-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Hyle v. PorterOhio Supreme Court · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API