Pearson v. Pearson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
Husband appeals the property settlement, maintenance and insurance provisions of a dissolution decree. We affirm in part, reverse and remand in part.
FACTS
Lawrence and Madelyn Pearson were both 58 when their 36 year marriage was dissolved in May 1984. During the marriage Lawrence worked as a teacher. His 1983-84 salary was $30,697. He nets approximately $1,700 per month. He has a vested pension which would yield $1,200 per month if he retired immediately. He plans to retire soon. In addition, he has a vested interest in a tax-sheltered annuity with a present value of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Marriage of Schmitz v. SchmitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Marriage of Kottke v. KottkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Marriage of Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Woosnam v. WoosnamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
3Cited by17 opinions
- Marriage of Rosenberg v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Campion v. CampionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Marriage of Linderman v. LindermanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Cummings v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Riley v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.