Legal Opinion

Blissenbach, a Minor v. Yanko

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 1951No. 3435 and 3437PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

In this opinion the parties will be called plaintiff and defendants.

Defendant The DeVilbiss Company, a corporation and nonresident of Mahoning county, upon which service was obtained in Lucas county, and defendant John Yanko, d. b. a. Jay’s Service Drug Store, separately appealed to this court on questions of law from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas entered upon a jury verdict for $41,000 against them. This was a joint action, brought against the two defendants as joint tort-feasors, by the plaintiff, an infant, through her mother as her parent and natural guardian, to recover damages…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Elliott v. HardinsOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Byrnes v. HewstonOhio Court of Appeals · 1920

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McCormack v. Hankscraft CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. Marguerite Jamieson v. Woodward & LothropCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  3. Shumard v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1967
  4. Alexander v. Seaboard Air Line Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1971
  5. Morrow v. Trailmobile, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API