Legal Opinion

Shumard v. General Motors Corporation

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided February 28, 1967No. Civ. A. 7904PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ENTRY

WEINMAN, Chief Judge.

This action was filed under the Ohio Wrongful Death Act as the result of the death of his decedent on January 8, 19.65. The complaint states that the plaintiff’s decedent was in an automobile collision with another vehicle and was killed while in a 1962 Corvair automobile which erupted into flames and killed plaintiff’s decedent.

The complaint sets forth four causes of action, to-wit, (1) Negligence, (2) Strict Liability in Tort, (3) Breach of Express and Implied Warranties, and (4) Wanton and Wilful Misconduct.

The singular issue presented by the complaint…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Campo v. ScofieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Kahn v. Chrysler CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1963
  3. Blissenbach, a Minor v. YankoOhio Court of Appeals · 1951

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Menifee v. Ohio Welding Products, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Erling David Larsen v. General Motors Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  3. Mieher v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Thomas Polk v. Ford Motor Company, Ethel Lee Marshall, Guardian v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  5. Robert L. Turcotte, Administrator of the Estate of Gerard P. Turcotte v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API